fine art. Classical references of course are numerous, but as has been pointed out, the general reading public of Lamb's day was no longer the kind to respond to such an appeal; moreover, Lamb was thoroughly convinced that his own native English contained stores as rich. In Lamb's work Coleridge is not so much a great English poet as a close friend of the author ; hence there is chaeles lamb, greatest OF THE essayists 565 a double interest when the names of Coleridge, Hunt, Boyle, and Hazlitt occur. None of the other essayists, excepting Steele occasionally, vrrites vrith such pathos as permeates Dream Children and underlies The Wedding. But Montaigne was not writing for a magazine, and Lamb was; consequently tbe latter had to set some limit to bis digressions other than that fixed by the fertility of his brain. (lecture date 1987) (Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism source: Misenheimer, James.,., and Carolyn Misenheimer. In Dream Children, for instance, his unfruitful attachment with Ann Simmons is referred. In the essays of the writers before him we are aware of a well-marked distance between interactive multimedia essay the writer and ourselves.
To continue reading, start your 48-hour free trial with eNotes ». Montaigne writes a ' Johnson's Dictionary. Did Lamb Understand Coleridge? His style is a mixture certainly of many styles, but a chemical not a mechanical mixture. (The entire section is 6,537 words.).
Gaius charles bolin dissertation
His versatility is amazing. I cry out about the shoes which pinch me, and, as I fancy, more naturally and pathetically than if my neighbour's corns were trodden under foot." And while the Round- abouts treat of almost every conceivable subject in the desultory style of Montaigne, the sentence. In the foregoing discussion an attempt has been made to show in outline that the English essay has had an al- most unbroken career as a literary form from the time essay competitions in nigeria 2018 of Bacon to the late nineteenth century, and in particular that the Essays. He poetises them, preserving them for us in art that can differentiate between genuine reality and crude realism. However, there is much difference between his essays and the essays of his model. Whether there was intention or not on the part of Lamb in following the lead of the eighteenth-century masters, it is obvious that Bridget Elia is much more shadowy as a character than either Jenny Bickerstaff or Sir Eoger de Coverley. The descriptions are touching enough, but Lambs treatment provides us with a humorous medium of perception rich in prismatic effects, which bathes the tragedy of actual life in the iridescence of mellow comedy. E'othing in Lamb not even the autobiographical element is so suggestive of Montaigne as the jovial contempt he fre- quently shows for any sort of unity iii his essays. But just as he was too versatile an essayist to conform to any particular mould, so in character writing he is too great an adept to confine himself to any form or any particular mood.